VLC vs MPC | A Complete Comparison

There are two possible rivals in the video player market; VLC player and MPC. Both of these software have specific media processing capabilities, but when it comes to professional-level real-time applications, careful consideration is needed. At this stage, people do wondering about VLC vs MPC; which one to choose.

Many people would be wondering which one to choose between MPC vs VLC Media Player. Many people who like similarities are possibly searching for stories in which these two influential media players are pitted against each other and their characteristics are compared side by side. Here is an article contrasting these two wonderful Media Players, reflecting on all main features and any other aspect that we can so that you can choose vlc or media player classic video player according to your choice.

Complete Comparison Between VLC vs MPC Media Player

If you are interested to know about KMPlayer and VLC comparison, you will find it here.

VLC Media Player, arguably the most common and commonly used media player, is a registered trademark of the VideoLAN non-profit organization. MPC(Media Player Classic) Media Player is an open-source as well as a lightweight media player classic alternative to VLC Media Player.

When you examine the core features of these two multimedia players, you’ll see that they’re both excellent. MPC video player has another lightweight version named MPC-HC. Who would you choose if you had to choose between the two: vlc vs mpc-hc? Both of them are free and open source also.

Here a difference table is provided between VLC and MPC players.

VLC	MPC
Lose frames while playing 4K videos	Can play 4K videos smoothly
Face issues with Windows lossless files	Can work properly with lossless files
Provide streaming support	Don’t support streaming
Support slow playbacks	Don’t support slow playback
Need to drag the subtitle file on top of the movie to sync properly	It doesn’t require that much work. It allows the subtitle to perform normally.
Support on different platform.	Only Windows user can use.
Has decent FX, shader	Support advanced filters

Let’s look at the functionality of both of these two multimedia players one by one.

1. User Interface Design

Both of these software’s user interfaces are very basic, so there isn’t anything to say about them. MPC’s architecture is based on that of its ancestor, Windows Media Player Classic, and it was inspired by the design of Windows XP/95 Media Player. VLC, on the contrary, has clunky icons of a deep orange hue that are always distracting to the eyes.

The real distinction is in their functionality and menus, with MPC player providing a more streamlined experience. In both full screen and small screen modes, it holds everything in its proper position, while in VLC, users must often organize a quest for their desired content. MPC preserves its size even though video playback loops are created, while VLC automatically restores power to the entire screen when playback starts. So, can it be said that VLC is better than MPC? You have to read the next sections to find the answer.

2. Audio Media Format Support

Both MPC and VLC backed WAV files up to 96KHz and 32 bits perfectly. Standard compressed media file formats such as APE FLAC, M4A, MP3, and Opus are also well supported. In terms of playing capability between vlc vs media player classic, both of these systems are unable to play .VQF files. If you want to play MOV files on Windows, you can read this article.

VLC has issues with Windows lossless files as well, but MPC-HC can manage them as well as Apple Lossless files. Both of these players performed admirably while playing DVD playback or CDs, but VLC was noticeably smoother when it came to tracking swapping.

3. Video File Support

MPC works admirably on all systems when it comes to HEVC files. MPC handled even 4K bluray content well, but VLC caused minor frame loss when the smoothness in between was lost though you use a dedicated GPU.

MPC performed better in nearly all media file comparisons, but its success with the old video formats like MPEG-1 file format deteriorated somewhat. However, both of these players had trouble finding track over WMV data, though VLC struggled to handle the longer hops.

The worst thing about VLC is that when it encounters a challenge while playing a media file, it always enters endless loops that can only be broken using task manager. However, in the case of MPC, if any files happen to be unsupported by this platform, it simply rejects them. You can learn about frame interpolation if you follow this writing.

4. Subtitles

In most of the subtitle checks, MPC got reasonable performance, but in VLC, you must drag the subtitle file on top of the movie for it to play in synchronization. SRT subtitles are treated as playable files by MPC, which allows them to function normally.

5. Support for Photo Formats

None of these tech systems was meant to manage multimedia files like photos, and you do not allow them to play slide shows. Nonetheless, VLC was able to open most images except JPEG and PNG files during testing, while MPC successfully viewed BMP images, uncompressed and compressed TIFF, animated and static GIF, PNG, and TGA files.

MPC, on the other hand, noticed a sudden lack of JPEG text, which was later shown correctly. MPC could be a good option for you if you don’t need to access JPEG content. It can handle most extensions with ease. Have you chosen between vlc media player vs media player classic already?

6. Support for Filters, FX, and Shades in Video

VLC and MPC are both standard-speed plays that allow you to leap to various points in the content with ease. However, VLC is well known for the amazing smoothness it provides for slow playbacks, allowing the initial pitch to be preserved, while MPC does not. MPC video player also has more sophisticated controls, such as dynamic magnification, which can be found behind a dialogue box. You can also change the monitor’s refresh rate to enjoy a smoother video experience. Both of them support codec of various things but the codec pack of VLC is very effective and helpful as codec is very important in terms of playing different formats things. Although k lite codec pack for MPC is supported a wide range of formats playing.

In the case of MPC, advanced filters such as emboss, edge sharpen, and grayscale are also available. VLC also has a decent FX and shader facility. So, media player classic or vlc? Which one do you prefer?

Conclusion

Finally, we might assume that the Media Player Classic has a following among consumers due to its ease of use, ease of installation, and lack of space requirements. However, since the app is only available for Windows devices, the Media Player Classic lags in terms of global usage numbers. After reading many articles, you can conclude that Media Player Classic has a visual advantage over VLC Media Player, but since the choices are small for consumers, many people choose to use VLC Media Player at least on their systems.

Although MPC is only for Windows, it has a lot of benefits for VLC Media. Perhaps in the future, Media Player will begin to work on other channels, and there will be a fierce rivalry. In terms of usability, Media Player Classic has a few advantages over VLC media. But VLC can be used to stream video also which is a very important feature.

If you aren’t a Windows user, the basic analogy becomes muddled. However, Media Player Classic and VLC Media are the clear winners for Windows users. Now it’s up to you to decide what to use! The ball is in your hand, and because all choices are open, the decision is yours to make. Remember, there is no Media Player Classic for Mac or other formats, so don’t even worry about it! So, VLC vs MPC, and which one to choose? We hope you got your answer to the question to video player comparison. If you choose vlc or mpc, we think you will be able to get the regular work done easily. Read this article on potplayer vs vlc to get a better idea about these media players.